logo
Shenzhen Perfect Precision Product Co., Ltd.
उत्पाद
बोली
उत्पाद
उत्पादों
समाचार
घर > समाचार >
कंपनी की खबर के बारे में Aluminum vs Stainless Steel: Performance and Cost Comparison for CNC Machining Precision Parts
आयोजन
संपर्क
संपर्क: Lyn
अभी संपर्क करें
हमें मेल करें

Aluminum vs Stainless Steel: Performance and Cost Comparison for CNC Machining Precision Parts

2025-12-06
Latest company news about Aluminum vs Stainless Steel: Performance and Cost Comparison for CNC Machining Precision Parts

1. Mechanical Properties: Strength vs Weight

Material Density (g/cm³) Tensile Strength (MPa) Hardness (HB) Corrosion Resistance
Aluminum 6061 2.7 310 95 Good, improved with anodizing
Stainless Steel 304 8.0 520 200 Excellent, resists oxidation

Aluminum is lightweight, which reduces overall part weight and is ideal for aerospace, automotive, and robotics applications.

Stainless steel offers higher tensile strength and hardness, suitable for wear-resistant components like gears, shafts, and structural supports.

Real-world insight: A CNC workshop producing precision gears for industrial robots found that switching from stainless steel to aluminum reduced the assembly weight by 35% without compromising dimensional accuracy.


2. Machinability and CNC Efficiency

Material Cutting Speed Tool Wear Surface Finish Recommended Coolant
Aluminum High Low Excellent Water-soluble oil or air cooling
Stainless Steel Low High Good Flood coolant or high-pressure lubrication

Aluminum machines faster with minimal tool wear. Typical milling cycle times are 20–30% shorter than stainless steel for similar geometry.

Stainless steel requires lower cutting speeds and more frequent tool replacement. Real-world data: Milling a 50 mm stainless steel bracket took 3.5 hours, whereas aluminum finished in 2 hours on the same 3-axis CNC machine.

Tips: Use sharp carbide tools for stainless steel and fine step-down strategies to avoid tool deflection.


3. Cost Comparison: Material and Processing

Cost Factor Aluminum Stainless Steel
Raw Material $2.5–3.5/kg $4.0–5.5/kg
Machining Hours Lower Higher (due to slower feed and tool wear)
Post-processing Optional anodizing Often polishing or passivation required

Aluminum is more economical for high-volume parts due to faster machining and lower material costs.

Stainless steel increases both material and operational costs but provides superior durability for harsh environments.


4. Application Suitability

Aluminum CNC parts: Lightweight housings, aerospace brackets, automotive prototypes, consumer electronics.

Stainless steel CNC parts: Medical instruments, food-grade machinery, structural supports, high-wear components.

Case Study: A CNC prototyping company replaced stainless steel brackets with 6061 aluminum for a drone project. Benefits included 30% faster machining, 40% weight reduction, and easier finishing with anodization.


5. Making the Right Choice

Performance priority: If your design demands high strength and wear resistance, stainless steel is preferred.

Weight and cost priority: Aluminum reduces weight and processing cost while maintaining precision.

Environmental exposure: Stainless steel is superior for corrosion-prone or high-temperature applications; anodized aluminum provides moderate protection at lower cost.